Tuesday, June 21, 2011

Strong science underpins the development of Marine Park plans for South Australia.

A wealth of science published over the last 150-160 years has been bought together to underpin the planning for marine parks in South Australia.  This science has formed the basis of three critical areas of investigation including: 
  1. what species and habitats exist in South Australia that are worthy of conservation, 
  2. what risks do human activities present to the conservation of these species and habitats and 
  3. what strategies are available to us to ensure the long term conservation and protection of these species and habitats.   
This science has been the work of dozens of Scientists many of whom have spent their lifetime enriching our knowledge and understanding of marine and coastal ecosystems of South Australia.

The earliest work to understand the ecology and biodiversity of our coastal waters began in the mid 1800’s (including work by the great British naturalist William Henry Harvey) and continued into and throughout the last century resulting in the publication of literally hundreds of research papers, books and popular press articles describing the richness and uniqueness of the flora and fauna of the South Australian coastline.  Work by such eminent scientists as Prof. Bryan Womersley (1922-2011) told us that southern Australian coastlines have a  richer flora and fauna than any comparable region anywhere else in the world with around (60-90%) of the species being endemic (not found anywhere else in the world).  From this we know that for many of these species, if we do not protect them here in South Australia they will not be protected anywhere else.

With an understanding of what species are present we subsequently developed our knowledge about the threats to the marine environment and the long term survival of these species.  Over that time we have identified numerous activities or processes that will impact and degrade marine ecosystems including stormwater, waste water and industrial pollution, dredging, fishing, aquaculture, the introduction of invasive species and not least ocean warming and acidification through climate change. From this work we have also developed an understanding that you cannot manage these impacts in isolation. In most cases the greatest threats to the marine environment come from the combined effect of many impacting process.

Over more recent times (the last 20-30 years) science has been used to address questions about how best to manage and protect natural resources and ecosystems in order to ensure benefits both now and into the future.  Through this work we have developed our knowledge about the use of different management regimes to address, for example,  the effects of fishing, pollution, aquaculture, dredging and the myriad of other processes that are a part of human impacts on global biodiversity. 

On balance the key outcome from this work has been an understanding that:
  1. It is easier and less costly to protect environments from harm than to try and rehabilitate damaged ecosystems.  This is as true for the fishing industry as any other where over-fishing can lead to long term social and economic impacts while fish stocks are being rebuilt. 
  2. No-take sanctuary zones provide an important tool for the management of diverse impacts on ecosystems. No-take sanctuary zones provide us with areas where ecological process and integrity are preserved which in turn provides an insurance policy against management failures in areas that are being otherwise utilised.

Over-fishing, pollution and climate change pose unprecedented risks to marine life

While calls for new marine protection strategies in South Australia are at risk of being vetoed by a liberal/family first coalition of skeptics a new international report warns that ocean life is "at high risk of entering a phase of extinction of marine species unprecedented in human history". The work results from a study by an international panel of experts commissioned by the International Programme on the State of the Ocean (IPSO) .

The report highlights the principle risks to the world's oceans coming from: over-fishing, pollution and climate change acting together in ways that have not previously been recognised. The report highlights that most, if not all, of the five global mass extinctions in Earth's history carry the fingerprints of global carbon perturbations - i.e. global warming, ocean acidification and anoxia or lack of oxygen. These three factors — the 'deadly trio' — ARE PRESENT in the ocean today and when considered in context with two key additional stressors (overfishing and pollution) they combine to undermine ocean resilience. For more on this story goto: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-13796479

Thank you for supporting SA Marine Parks

The fiction of sustainable Australian Fisheries

The Australian Sea Lion faces extinction in the face of continued mortality as a by-catch from commercial fisheries and government inaction.

With only around 11,000 individuals left in the wild the ongoing mortality of this species, estimated to exceed 2% per year from fishing related causes alone, puts the species in danger of extinction within a few decades.

Recent proposals for Commonwealth Marine Parks have failed to provide an adequate level of protection and the situation is made more dire as South Australian Marine Parks face being closed down by fishers before they have even started.

To read more about the fate of this species and the failure of Government to provide a meaningful level of protection follow this link.

Saturday, June 18, 2011

Six out of 10 WA fishers support marine sanctuary zones

WA Research Findings:
  • Six out of 10 people who frequently fish (fished more than 12 times in the past year) support protecting at least 30 per cent of the waters of WA’s coast in marine sanctuaries.
  • 63 per cent of West Australians believe that marine life in WA’s waters is in decline.
  • Eight out of 10 West Australians would like the state and federal governments to work together to establish marine sanctuaries off the WA coast.
  • 67 per cent of people support protecting at least 30 per cent of waters directly off the coast from Perth, such as the Perth Canyon, in a marine sanctuary.
Read more - from CCWA